Professor John Nkemnji, Ph.D.
Research and Selected Publications
http://johnnkemnji.cgpublisher.com/
http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/
http://learningconference.com/Program/LC04DraftProgram.doc
http://learningconference.com/ProposalSystem/Presentations/P001069
http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/browse/date.htm
http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/kirk.htm
http://theuniversitypressjournals.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.30/prod.178
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~esinglet/fall2005/newsletter_1.pdf
http://webquest.org/questgarden/lessons/09888-051204124038/credits.htm
http://www.leca-usa.com/projects.php
http://vital.wisconsin.edu/bestprac/group.htm
THE EFFECTS OF RELEVANCE AND ORGANIZATION
OF COURSE CONTENT
ON ACHIEVEMENT IN CAMEROON SECONDARY SCHOOLS
John Nkemnji
(1988 Ph.D. Dissertation Abstract - UT Austin)
Intrigued both by student failure and societal disappointments in
the rewards of formal education, (especially in Cameroon where the
researcher has been both a student and teacher), a set of
hypotheses and research questions were generated for testing -- six
hypotheses were tested. Four of the hypotheses have been retained
and two have been rejected. The study empirically tested the effects of
relevance (and organization) of course content on achievement.
Subjects (N=102)were secondary education students in
Cameroon. The educational system there follows a British and
French model with little consideration of Cameroon's significant
differences in available resources, societal structure, culture, and
technical development. One hundred and two Form II students (about
9th. grade equivalent in the American system) were assigned randomly to
four experimental treatment groups. Lectures presented to
subjects in the four groups were designed to reflect the following
experimental conditions:
(a). Explicitly
relevant/intentionally organized content
(b). Implicitly relevant/intentionally organized
content
(c). Explicitly relevant/incidentally organized
content
(d). Implicitly relevant/incidentally organized
content
Subjects in the groups listened to, and watched a twenty-minute
tape-recorded lesson, accompanied by slides on a common topic.
The content was identical for all experimental treatments except for
the manipulation of factors of relevance and organization.
Student achievement was measured using an immediate and a delayed
posttest designed to cover lesson concepts and objectives. There
was no pretest; however, subjects were pre-assessed following their
responses to an item on the questionnaire. Subjects completed two
sets of questionnaires for statistical and demographic purposes.
Results of the study, using a factorial ANOVA design, and the
cross tabulation method of analysis, yielded asignificant effect
(p<.01) for explicit relevance and intentional organization.
Interaction was found between relevance and organization.
Explicit relevance and intentional organization correlated with high
motivation for learning. Student evaluation of lesson content
indicated higher ratings for explicitly relevant and intentionally
organized content. No other statistically significant results were
obtained. Findings about the variable of relevance-of-lesson-content
provided the first empirical verification of a practical theory.
The results are discussed in relationship to instructional theory, to
probable effectiveness of lesson and textbook emphases, and to teaching.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of
Meaningful Verbal Learning.
New York: Grune&
Stratton.
Belgard, M., & Rosenshine, B., & Gage,
N.L. (1968). Teacher's effectiveness in explaining:
Evidence on its generality and
correlation with pupils' rating and attention
scores. Stanford: California.
Benjamin, H. (1939). The Saber-Tooth
Curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of
Education. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1971). The skill of relevance or
the relevance of skill. Saturday Review, 53, 66.
Coombs, P. H., (1970). The need for a new
strategy of educational development.
In International Targets for
Development. (ed.) Symonds, R. Harper Colophon Books,
Harper & Row: New York.
Dewey, J. (1902). The Child and the Curriculum
& The School and Society.
The University of Chicago
Press: Chicago.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive
dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.
Fortune, J. C. (1967). A Study of the
Generality of Presenting Behavior in Teaching.
Memphis, TN: Memphis State
University.
Glasser, W. (1969). Schools without
failure. New York: Harper & Row.
Holt, J. (1964). How Children Fail. New
York: Pitman Publishing Corporation.
Illich, I. (1960). Deschooling
Society. Penguin Books. Harmondsworth.
Kallison, J. M. (1981). Organization of the
lesson as it affects student achievement.
Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, The University of Texas-Austin.
Kohl, H. (1967). 36 Children. The
New American Library, Inc. New York:
New York.
Kozol, J. (1972). Free Schools Fail BecauseThey
Don't Teach. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Company
Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1984). Topic
structure representation and text
recall. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 76, 137-147.
Meyer, B. J. (1975). The organization of prose and
its effects in memory.
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
O'Leary, L. R. (1971). Comparative study ofthe
perceived relevance of material to
be learned and its impact on the
performance of culturally deprived Junior
College students. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 62, 405-409.
Rychlak, J. F. (1966). Reinforcement value; a
suggested idiographic
intensity dimension of meaningfulness
for the personality theorist.
Journal of Personality, 34, 311-335.
Whitman, R. F., & Timmis, J. H. (1975). The
influence of verbal
organizational structure and verbal
organizational skills on
select measures of learning. Human
Communication Research, 1, 293-301.
Yoleye, E. A. (1986). The relevance of
educational content to national needs in
Africa. International Reviewof
Education, 32, 149-172.