Standards and Procedures for Approved Master's Theses
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Requirements

Guidelines Approved by
The Graduate Council
University of Wisconsin-Platteville

February 2001

Masters Writing Requirement

Students must satisfy the writing requirement of their degree program as determined by individual programs subject to approval by the Graduate Council. Examples of experiences that meet this requirement include thesis, research paper, and oral or written comprehensive examination, project, performance, exhibition, and an integrative course. Students should consult with individual program advisors for guidelines for meeting your program requirement. All programs must follow a common set of procedures for thesis approval and submission.

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville School of Graduate Studies maintains a website (Graduate Studies Resources) with useful links to guide the graduate student in grammar, style, evaluating web resources, and formats (Thesis students will find the Texas A&M link useful for formatting procedures and other technical assistance). The thesis advisor will provide guidance regarding the site. The site may be accessed through the University Karrmann Library (/library/reference/writers.html)

1.Checklist for Completion of the Masters Thesis

__In consultation with program advisor, the student proposes a committee of three faculty members. The committee usually includes thesis advisor, one additional major department member, and one faculty member from another area.

__Prepare a thesis proposal that includes the following:

    An approval page to be assigned by the advisor and committee members
    An introduction
    A statement of the problem
    Purpose of the study
    Hypothesis, if applicable
    Significance or implications of the study
    Assumptions necessary to undertake the study
    Delimitation of the study
    Method of approach including data sources, data gathering methods, and likely analyses
    General plan of the organization

__Approval (in writing) of the study by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research before research is initiated, if necessary.

__Submit thesis proposal with signed approval page and approval memo from Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research, if necessary, to the School of Graduate Studies Office to be placed in student file.

__Register for 7990, "Thesis Research".

__Prepare the thesis with regular meetings with the thesis advisor

__Submit completed thesis to thesis advisor-advisor will submit thesis for review to committee

__Thesis advisor, in consultation with the student, schedules the thesis oral examination.

__Thesis advisor certifies in writing that the oral examination has been successfully completed. The certification is provided for the School of Graduate Studies.

__Submit completed thesis (with signatures), paper deposition form, an extra copy of the abstract and binding payment to the School of Graduate Studies. Each student should consult his/her thesis advisor regarding requirements for additional copies. The thesis binding fee currently (4/4/01) is $ 30.00/copy.

2. Paper Preparation

  1. The paper should follow one of three adopted manuals: A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations by Katie L. Turabian; The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association or Modern Language Association Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, or any style approved by the major department.
  2. The library copy must be printed on one side of standard size (8 ½ x11") with high cotton content twenty pound bond paper.
  3. A paper must be word processed with 12 point Times New Roman font utilized for the body of the paper
  4. Margins: the left margin of each page must be two inches. The top, right, and bottom margins are one inch. Tables, figures, and appendix materials must fit the same margins.
  5. A thesis proposal must follow the proposal approval page format - no page number (Appendix A)
  6. A thesis approval page must follow the approval page format - no page number (Appendix B)
  7. A thesis title page must follow the thesis title page format - no page number (Appendix C)
  8. A thesis must include an abstract based on the University of Wisconsin approved format (Appendix D)
  9. A thesis must include a table of contents (the chapters usually follow the elements in the appendix, but other formats are possible with the approval of the thesis committee). (Appendix E)

3. General Suggestions

  • There is no set length for thesis paper
  • The student should demonstrate the ability to interpret data and show evidence of critical thinking in the evaluation of sources
  • The writer of the paper should develop the subject according to the principles of clear and effective composition. The writer should organize the material in his/her paper on the basis of its relation to one central idea.
  • Attention should be given to the expression of ideas with consideration for writing style, grammar, and guidelines to reduce bias in language. Bias in languages includes gender, sexual orientation, racial and ethnic identity, disabilities, and age. It is the student's responsibility to have the paper reviewed by a competent individual for writing conventions such as spelling, grammar, unity, clarity, coherence and emphasis.
  • It is the student's responsibility to prepare the final draft.
  • It is up to the student to be in accordance with his/her advisor regarding deadlines. Please provide the advisor adequate time to read and critique each draft of the paper. The advisor should allow the student time to make suggested changes.
  • The completed thesis is due at the School of Graduate Studies Office within one week after successfully completing the oral examination.
  • The student is advised to finish the paper as soon as possible even if he/she receives an "Incomplete" in thesis research for a semester.
  • The student is required to make application for the thesis oral examination during the first week of the summer session or the first two weeks of the fall/spring semester in which the oral examination is to be completed through the School of Graduate Studies. The application forms are available at the office or online.
  • Please check with your advisor for additional requirements.


Appendix A

Sample Thesis Proposal Approval Page
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's proposal)

A THESIS PROPOSAL WITH SUGGESTED METHODS OF RESEARCH

The attached sample thesis proposal, by Karen S. Steindorf, entitled An Examination of Counselor's Perceptions of Their Effectiveness in Their Role as School Counselor, when completed, is to be submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Platteville in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science in Education degree, for which 3 credits shall be allowed is hereby:

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Chair

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Appendix A

Thesis Proposal Approval Page Blank Form
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's proposal)

The attached thesis proposal, by _________________, entitled ____________________________________________________, when completed, is to be submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Platteville in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the ________________________ degree, for which ___ credits shall be allowed is hereby:

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Chair

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member


Appendix B

Sample Thesis Approval Page
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's paper)

AN EXAMINATION OF COUNSELOR'S PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN THEIR ROLE AS SCHOOL COUNSELOR

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Chair

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Appendix B

Thesis Approval Page Blank Form
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's paper)

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Chair

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member

Approved: _____________________________ Date: _________________
Committee Member


Appendix C

Sample Thesis Title Page
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's paper)

AN EXAMINATION OF COUNSELOR'S PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN THEIR ROLE AS SCHOOL COUNSELOR

A Thesis

Presented to

The Graduate Faculty

University of Wisconsin-Platteville

.

In Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirement for the Degree

Master of Science in Education

Counselor Education

.

By

Karen S. Steindorf

1988

Appendix D

Sample Thesis Abstract
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's abstract)

AN EXAMINATION OF COUNSELOR'S PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN THEIR ROLE AS SCHOOL COUNSELOR

Karen S. Steindorf
Under the Supervision of Dr. James King

Statement of the Problem

Research shows us that there are no sufficient measures to determine the effectiveness of school counselors. As school counselor roles are questioned due to the multifaceted duties that are being given them, role confusion plays a part in the inability to sufficiently measure effectiveness.

Another reason for insufficient measures is because the data we are attempting to measure is intangible. While statements can be made that indicate school counseling interventions have a positive impact on students educational and personal development, there is no piece of evidence to determine how and what actions specifically contributed to this result.

Self-Efficacy Theory is one that attempts to explain how and why individuals organize and execute courses of action required to attain certain types of performances. The research problem exhibited in this study is to help identify sources of self-efficacy among counselors and find a relevant instrument to measure the effectiveness experienced by Wisconsin graduate students and practitioners.

Methods and Procedures

A survey, the Counselor Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) that was developed by a Michigan University Research Study, was used in a survey of Wisconsin School Counselors to determine their perception of their own effectiveness. An additional 7-items was added to the CSES and designed to determine the counselors belief system.

The survey was distributed to graduate students and counselors at the 1998 annual Wisconsin School Counselor Association held in Stevens Point, Wisconsin. Its purpose was to compare the results and determine if there were any significant differences between the self-efficacy of Wisconsin School Counselors and the Michigan norm group.

It was also used to determine if self-efficacy levels of Wisconsin School Counselors vary significantly over years of experience.

The data was collected, analyzed, and comparisons were made to the Michigan study to reveal the self-perceived effectiveness of Wisconsin Counselors in terms of self-efficacy.

Summary of Results

School Counselors in Wisconsin perceive themselves to have a high measure to self-efficacy. The results of this study also revealed that there was no significant difference between Wisconsin School Counselors and the Michigan norm group in terms of self-efficacy, despite some variances in tabulating the results between the two groups. The data did show, however, that self-efficacy among Wisconsin Counselors seems to diminish over time.

Be reviewing the historical perspective of counseling, the counselor's role, and the value of self-efficacy, it is clear that school counselors are faced with an array of challenges. Program evaluation and counselor effectiveness evaluation is essential for the future of the program.

It is clear from this study that more research needs to be done in learning how to measure the effectiveness of the counselor, in order to establish credibility and accountability for the profession.

Appendix E

Sample Thesis Table of Contents
(note: the above two lines should not appear on the student's table of contents)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
APPROVAL PAGEi
TITLE PAGEii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSiii
ABSTRACTiv
TABLE OF CONTENTSv
LIST OF TABLES vi
CHAPTER
I. INTRODUCTION 1
  • Statement of the Problem
  • Purpose of the Study
  • Significance of the Study
  • Assumptions
  • Delimitation of the Study
  • Methodology
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6
  • The Role of the Counselor
  • Program Evaluation
  • Counselor Effectiveness Research
III. SURVEY METHODOLOGY 23
  • Procedures
  • Participants
  • Instrumentation
IV. ANALYSIS OF THE SURVEY DATA 28
  • Comparison of the Michigan Study
    with Wisconsin Counselors
  • Differential Years of Practice
  • Constraint Effects
V. SUMMARY,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
33
  • Summary
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
REFERENCES 42
APPENDIX A 45


Appendix F

Master's Oral Examination Report

MASTER'S ORAL EXAMINATION REPORT

_________________________________ took the master's oral examination on
_________________________________.
Month, Day, Year

The student's performance was:

____________________________ Satisfactory

____________________________ Unsatisfactory

____________________________ Other

Explain other: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________Paper Advisor

_______________________________Member

_______________________________Member

_______________________________Member

revised 2/8/00